Tag Archives: television

Which is your favourite Diet Coke hunk?

Did you know it has been 20 years since a group of office workers ran to the window at 11:30 am every day to gawp, gaze, ogle and drool over a construction worker satisfying his thirst with a calorie-controlled fizzy drink.

Then in 1997, it was the turn of ‘Window Cleaner’ Diet Coke man, followed 10 year later by ‘Lift Engineer and today’s incarnation of ‘Lawn Mower Boy’.

Here they all are:

1994 diet coke 1994 “Construction Worker”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1997 diet coke 1997 “Window Cleaner” – he’s my favourite, and yes, I admit he was my background wallpaper on my PC at work in 1997, and my home PC. I’d stop work at 11:30 to look…wouldn’t you?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2007 diet coke2007 “Lift Engineer”

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014 diet coke 2014 “Lawn Mower Boy” – definitely fit, but my heart belongs to the window cleaner 😉

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So which one is your favourite “Diet Coke” hunk?

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under General

What is Appropriate Viewing for Children?

Well in my opinion definitely not the latest Batman, Spiderman or Superman!

I am talking children of pre-school/reception year here, so the under-fives in particular.

Films have classifications for a reason. Even those classed as parental guidance really sometimes should not be shown to very young children.

Television as well has its division, CBeebies and Milkshake for the under sixes and CBBC and CITV as older counterparts. I know that with the 500 million channels out there, there is also Disney Junior, Nick Jnr, etc.

But as parents we have to be responsible for what our children watch.

SC watches CBeebies, occasionally Milkshake (and even then the ads are censored, even these can be inappropriate for the age range)

The reason?

I firmly believe that children are extremely impressionable at this young age. Their imaginations work overtime and everything and anything can be used in play situations.

A firm favourite at the moment is Tree-Fu Tom. This is a harmless animated series about a little boy who has magical powers and does tree-fu (gets the children up doing basic non-violent martial art moves) whilst saving Treetopolis and his friends from some disaster.

However, SC loves the programme so much that he really believes he can do Tree-Fu magic. He went into school and started practising this magic, I hasten to add not touching any other child, just moving his arms around and making swoosh noises, but other children thought that because of the sounds and movement he was doing something menacing like trying to shoot them!

I had to explain to the teacher that (a) he has no idea what a gun is and (b) he doesn’t watch inappropriate television. I know it was all innocent, but how did these other 4 and 5 year olds know about guns and shooting and killing people? Obviously they have seen it somewhere.

After I spoke to SC, we now have a mantra before we go into school each day that he mustn’t do Tree-Fu magic, make noise or move his arms around!

He also doesn’t watch inappropriate films. Disney’s about as far as it goes in this house.

As parents we, no one else, we are responsible for what we let out children watch. Surely, if we think it something is not suitable, they do not watch it. It cares not one iota if little Jimmy in the playground watches it.

I have seen children playing who have been allowed to watch inappropriate television/films. It seems, especially boys, to make them more destructive in their play! I remember a little boy the same age as SC who had watched Spiderman, Batman, all the latest, and then watched as he took a toy and then wreaked havoc as all other children were playing, by violently hitting their toys, knocking down stuff with no care or regard for anyone else.

I know all little boys love action heroes, etc. But if you look at things, the Batman TV series of the sixties was innocent compared to the mindless violence that Hollywood shove down our throats in the latest Batman movie.

And that’s the whole point. Innocence. Life, to some degree was more innocent two or three generations ago. You only have to look at the films, TV series, lyrics to songs and pop stars. There were no (at least very few) children getting pregnant at 11. Cheesy pop the 80s may have had but you can still remember the lyrics to Karma Chameleon I’ll bet? Gyrating pelvises and scantily clad females were not shoved down your throat (for want of a better phrase), films too were gentler.

Is it since the birth of so much advanced technology – 500 million tv channels (and still nothing decent to watch), i-pods, i-phones, internet on demand everywhere and anywhere, computer games, etc that we started heading down the slippery slope of moral decline and loss of innocence?

Next time you go to the cinema, just look at the violence that each and every film has? Is it necessary?

When was the last time you saw a computer game that didn’t involve killing everyone in sight?

Children are children.

Life is tough enough as it is without ramming thoughts of violence, death and destruction into their heads from a young age. Unless we, as parents take responsibility the world is going to keep falling into the downward spiral it seems to be in.

One last thought on how impressionable children can be:

SC was at school, one little boy said that he was going to take another little boy chop him up, put him in a hole and blow him up! This child was 5! Where on earth did he get that sort of idea from if not from watching something wholly inappropriate?

Leave a comment

Filed under Children

Royal Institution Christmas Lectures

Now, these are a bit like Marmite, you either love them or hate them.

Being a nerdy geeky type, personally I love them.

I will always remember watching them, every year with my dad, and they were (and still are) on in the days between Christmas and New Year. Who remembers Professor Heinz Wolff?

They were, when I was young (OMG that makes me sound so old!), half an hour long, aimed at children with a fun theme that children can relate to.

Then Channel 4 or was it 5 took them over, and they moved to 5 o’clock in the evening and 45 minutes long, and now they are back on the Beeb, BUT on BBC4 at 8PM.

What happened to them being aimed at kids as young as 5/6. Or do all 5/6 year olds these days not go to bed til midnight?

And they are an hour long too.

I actually went to see one being filmed a couple of years ago. Loved it and I can’t wait to take SC, but judging by the average age of the kids in the audience this year, that’s not going to be for a few years yet 😦

But why do they appear to have made them less for children of any age, and more for your 8/9 year olds plus, and put them on at a ridiculous time, and channel?

Come on Royal Institution get back to fun science for children of all ages and please BBC next Christmas make them half an hour and put them on at a time when children can sit and enjoy them with their parents, instead of boring us rigid with yet another Eastenders omnibus!

Leave a comment

Filed under Other Reviews

The Age of Innocence

Childhood is so brief and we are supposed to look back on it with fond memories in our dotage.

So why is society intent on making our children grow up too quickly. Sex & drugs education at 5, careers advice at 7, pregnant at 9 or 10,  in AA at 12 and drug rehab at 15.

Wow! What wonderful childhood memories to look back on. Paints a scary picture though and if things carry on this will be the norm for the next generation.

So how do we stop the rot, so to speak.

Initially parents! The buck stops there.

Whether it be single parents, married (hetero or same-sex), we are responsible for our children’s upbringing. We are their role models and their guides through to adulthood.

Think back to your childhood would your parents have let you stay up ’til all hours, or watch inappropriate films/television. If the answer is no, then ask yourself why it is now appropriate to let your children do this.

How angry would your parents have been if you hadn’t said please, or thank you? Why is it now the norm for children not to say this. ‘Thank you’ – those two little words carry such weight.

What would your parents have done if you had been rude to a teacher at school? Why do we now hear so many stories of teachers being abused by pupils, or teachers disciplining children only to have the parents turn on the teacher instead of backing them up?

So parents (and I do appreciate it’s not everyone) take responsiblity for your children. It is not the school’s fault if they don’t teach your children discipline and manners – it’s yours. It’s not society’s fault that your children don’t know right from wrong – it’s yours. It’s not the computer games company’s fault that they sell inappropriate games – it’s yours for buying it.

It’s up to us to instill a sense of decency into the next generation and the only people who can do that for our children is us as parents.

The next on the list is the media.

Children’s programmes and there are a lot of good ones out there, but they should be appropriate.

There are far too many where, again children never say please or thank you and are shown to be self-centred.

Do we need cartoons where the ‘bad guy’ is drawn in an unpleasant way – the character comes from the voice. Bullying starts because people are different – if young children are exposed to bad guys being different then they will assume all people who look different are bad. That might not make sense to you as an adult, but think about it with child logic!

Sketch shows should have age appropriate humour. Slapstick is great but it is not suitable for a show aimed at preschoolers/infants to show someone failing to get into a cannon (with the intent of being fired out) and then having the cannon explode on his face!

After children’s programmes come adverts – yes Milkshake! I’m talking about you. How suitable is it to show trailers for 12+ movies during a break when it is obvious that preschoolers will be watching – ditto 18+ computer games.

Adverts should, again be age appropriate – and gosh, can’t you tell Christmas is upon us. How lovely it was to have a few adverts before September (again totally irrelevant to children’s programmes – life insurance, washing machines, etc) between programmes, whereas now each programme is separated by a good 5 minutes of adverts. But I digress…

I think the worst  advert for a toy I have seen, again on Channel 5, during Milkshake, is something called a blade spinner. Now I’m not blaming the television company for this one but the toy manufacturer. How intelligent is it in this day and age when teenagers are being knifed left, right and centre to produce a toy called “blade spinner” where the object, a car, is aimed towards this monster who has “knife-like” claws and spins around trying to whack the car out-of-the-way. I’m sorry, I just find it irresponsible.

Finally on adverts – Lalli-Kalli. Love the shoes, but is it really necessary to give away free make-up to 5 year olds!

Let’s grow up a  bit and leave pre-school behind. Teenagers – bless ’em. We were all one once, but were we really that scary that when an older person came across a group of us they crossed the street?

Note to teenagers – being a celebrity is not a career option!

Why do so many teenagers go out and get drunk? Because it’s cool? Because there’s nothing else to do?

I think it’s partly to look cool – but believe me there is nothing cool about being so drunk you end up either in casualty having your stomach pumped, or you spend several hours staring down a toilet bowl!

Would I be right in assuming boredom plays a big part?

If it’s boredom, as the old saying goes “go out and find something less boring to do instead”.

OK, so I know youth clubs and scouting are not perceived as “cool” any more – so make it, or anything else cool. Channel your bored energy and find a ‘hobby’ – who knows it could turn into a job??

Talking of jobs and teenagers – soap producers take note – why do no teenage soap characters on British television ever seem to have any career ambition. They all seem to drop out, or leave school at 16 with no idea what to do and so they drift.

So I say to everyone – parents, media and society – STOP! THINK! And let our children enjoy being children for as long as possible

1 Comment

Filed under Children

Has anyone else noticed…

… that there are literally only 4 types of television programmes these days:

  1. Cop shows
  2. Medical shows
  3. Reality TV shows
  4. Cooking Shows

I seriously cannot think of any other type of television programme.

Seriously programme makers, there really are only so many ways to solve a murder – couldn’t we just have the one detective. Preferably Gene Hunt! He doesn’t take any nonsense and, don’t ask me why, definitely sexier than all these balding, middle-aged detectives.

I know everyone these days is desperate for their Andy Warhol ’15 minutes of fame’ but do we really have to endure all the reality rubbish. If we want to see idiots behaving badly, all we need do is go into the local town centre at the weekend around closing time to see the local morons – why should I pay my TV licence to have to watch them. Years ago (Victorian times it has to be said) I believe they opened up the asylums and let people laugh at the inmates!

And seriously, some of the stuff these cooks make, in such a short time, I wouldn’t touch with a barge pole. Not only do you never see them washing their hands after handling raw products – which puts me off ever eating in their restaurants – but nothing ever seems cooked. Especially meat. There’s rare and then there’s just shaved off the animal’s backside and served.

And the worst news is, thanks to satellite, digital television we now have a gazillion number of channels to watch – all showing the same rubbish.

Surely, someone in programme making can come up with someone vaguely mediocre?

To be honest, I very rarely watch television anymore, because there is never anything to watch!

Leave a comment

Filed under General